From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] bind: bump version to 9.11.0-P5 (security)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:32:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170413213230.5ce1536c@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413133209.36781-1-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Hello,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:32:09 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> Security Fixes:
> - rndc "" could trigger an assertion failure in named. This flaw is
> disclosed in (CVE-2017-3138). [RT #44924]
> - Some chaining (i.e., type CNAME or DNAME) responses to upstream
> queries could trigger assertion failures. This flaw is disclosed in
> CVE-2017-3137. [RT #44734]
> - dns64 with break-dnssec yes; can result in an assertion failure. This
> flaw is disclosed in CVE-2017-3136. [RT #44653]
> - If a server is configured with a response policy zone (RPZ) that
> rewrites an answer with local data, and is also configured for DNS64
> address mapping, a NULL pointer can be read triggering a server
> crash. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2017-3135. [RT #44434]
> - A coding error in the nxdomain-redirect feature could lead to an
> assertion failure if the redirection namespace was served from a
> local authoritative data source such as a local zone or a DLZ instead
> of via recursive lookup. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9778.
> [RT #43837]
> - named could mishandle authority sections with missing RRSIGs,
> triggering an assertion failure. This flaw is disclosed in
> CVE-2016-9444. [RT #43632]
> - named mishandled some responses where covering RRSIG records were
> returned without the requested data, resulting in an assertion
> failure. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9147. [RT #43548]
> - named incorrectly tried to cache TKEY records which could trigger an
> assertion failure when there was a class mismatch. This flaw is
> disclosed in CVE-2016-9131. [RT #43522]
> - It was possible to trigger assertions when processing responses
> containing answers of type DNAME. This flaw is disclosed in
> CVE-2016-8864. [RT #43465]
>
> Full release notes:
>
> ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.11.0-P5/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.11.0-P5.html
>
> Also, remove --enable-rrl configure option from bind.mk as it doesn't
> exist anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
> ---
> package/bind/bind.hash | 4 ++--
> package/bind/bind.mk | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied! Peter, this should be applied to the LTS branch.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-13 13:32 [Buildroot] [PATCH] bind: bump version to 9.11.0-P5 (security) Vicente Olivert Riera
2017-04-13 19:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-04-24 19:25 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170413213230.5ce1536c@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox