From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 23:10:28 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 0/5] Runtime testing infrastructure In-Reply-To: <8b9222c3-8547-fe79-09dc-288553b2a9e2@lucaceresoli.net> References: <1490042214-6762-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20170507220901.4000ec8e@free-electrons.com> <8b9222c3-8547-fe79-09dc-288553b2a9e2@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <20170507231028.3316cffd@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 7 May 2017 22:41:09 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Bad timing on my side: I was reviewing all this work in detail a couple > of days ago, but my reviews to 2 patches are in my drafts folder waiting > for the remaining ones... Ok, I'll send them anyway right noe as a list > of proposed improvements. Thanks for your review! > > I know Luca, Ricardo and Thomas DS had some comments, but I believe it > > would be easier to address them as follow-up patches. So Luca, Ricardo, > > Thomas, your patches to improve this testing infrastructure are more > > than welcome. I'm sure it needs to be extended and improved in many > > different ways to test more Buildroot functionalities. > > I totally agree this is the best way to proceed. Now everybody can > easily send small, incremental patches to improve the work. Thanks for > having applied these patches. Yes, it will allow everyone to send small, incremental patches, me included. > Any plan to have the tests run automatically (on the autobuilders maybe)? Yes, we will definitely want to do that. I don't think the autobuilders will do it. Instead I believe running the tests on Gitlab CI would be easier and more appropriate. I'm sure Arnout can help :-) Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com