From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:40:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] vdr: bump version to 2.3.6 In-Reply-To: <0fa02a35-fea3-b720-a139-b6f02d24ff13@imgtec.com> References: <20170605100525.44776-1-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <0fa02a35-fea3-b720-a139-b6f02d24ff13@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20170605144030.27e14e14@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:34:30 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > > did you build the release with uclibc? I got errors because of the new > > debugging code which uses execinfo.h. > > nope, I didn't build it with uClibc. For the record, uClibc is our default C library, so not testing package bumps with what is our default C library is a bit crazy. We have even introduced a tool, test-pkg, that helps testing that packages build fine. Please use it. Maybe not to test all toolchains, but at least make sure it builds reasonably. Submitting a package bump that isn't even build tested with uClibc is not acceptable. I'd prefer to see *less* package bump patches, but *better* ones. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com