From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: remove version choice
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:27:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607212720.GA23160@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606213500.0fe44a79@free-electrons.com>
Waldemar, Thomas, All,
On 2017-06-06 21:35 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:56:59 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > We do not support uClibc-ng/musl C library version choice support,
> > do the same for GNU C Library.
> > Add me as Maintainer for the package.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
>
> On this one, I'd like to have the opinion of others. Arnout? Peter?
> Yann? What do you think about this?
>
> I don't have a very clear-cut opinion about this one.
Neither do I.
On principle, I agree that we should drop versions. But glibc is part of
the toolchain, and the toolchain has always been special.
True, we do not have a version for uClibc-ng, but we do have some
traction on the maintainer! ;-) So we know things are gonna be fixed
soonish, or that we can grab a temporary backport, both very easily.
Not so much for glibc in my experience...
musl is another kind of thing, because it is (was?) moving relatively
fast, and I am under the impression that the maintainers are somewhat
amenable to some fixes.
Not so much for glibc in my experience...
So, I won't oppose the patch, not will I push for it...
Yep, that is a very clear-cut position... ;-]
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> > diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS
> > index cdd38e6..bfeb824 100644
> > --- a/DEVELOPERS
> > +++ b/DEVELOPERS
> > @@ -1686,6 +1686,7 @@ F: arch/Config.in.sparc
> > F: package/uclibc/
> > F: package/uclibc-ng-test/
> > F: package/mksh/
> > +F: package/glibc/
>
> Alphabetic ordering not correct here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 17:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: remove version choice Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-06-06 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-07 21:27 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2017-06-08 19:44 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-06-08 19:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-08 20:10 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-06-10 9:19 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-06-10 11:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-10 10:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607212720.GA23160@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox