From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:29:21 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/imagemagick: change download url to github In-Reply-To: <877f09glcd.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20170618074538.1237-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <877f09glcd.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20170619152921.6a37a345@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:13:54 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.5-10 > > -IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz > > -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases > > +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz > > +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archive > > That SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream > (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back > to getting it from sources.buildroot.org? I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com