From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] core: postpone evaluation on decompressor dependencies
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:36:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170702123621.67df4ae7@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170702103030.2210-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Hello,
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:30:30 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Currently, we build any extractor dependency as soone as the host
soone -> soon
> utility is missing, even when such utility is not needed.
>
> That is expecially the case for host-lzip, which is lacking except in
expecially -> especially
> the most recent distributions, and thus is always built, which is a bit
I'm not sure to understand the "except in the most recent
distributions". Indeed, even in the most recent distributions, lzip may
not be installed.
> of a shame since only very few packages need it.
>
> To fix that, we change the host dependecies check to set a variable
> named after the extension they support, to the name of the host package
> that provides the necessary decompressor, if not installed on the host.
>
> Then, we introduce a new variable, UNCOMP_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES, to which
I think EXTRACT_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES would be easier to understand. Yes,
it's not technically extraction but uncompression, but they are needed
as part of Buildroot "extract" step for each package, so I believe
EXTRACT_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES would be better.
> diff --git a/package/pkg-generic.mk b/package/pkg-generic.mk
> index f474704980..5745a9cfcf 100644
> --- a/package/pkg-generic.mk
> +++ b/package/pkg-generic.mk
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ DL_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES += cvs
> endif # SITE_METHOD
>
> DL_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES += $$(call extractor-dependency,$$($(2)_SOURCE))
> +UNCOMP_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES += $$(UNCOMP_TOOL_DEPENDENCY$$(suffix $$($(2)_SOURCE)))
I know we looked at it yesterday, but I again don't remember what
extractor-dependency is for. When looking at this code, it seems a bit
weird that extractor dependencies are added to DL_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES
and "uncompressor dependencies" are added to UNCOMP_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES.
Can we clarify this ? Should the output of extractor-dependency be added
to UNCOMP_TOOLS_DEPENDENCIES ? Do we need both extractor-dependency and
UNCOMP_TOOL_DEPENDENCY ?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-02 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-02 10:30 [Buildroot] [PATCH] core: postpone evaluation on decompressor dependencies Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-02 10:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-07-02 11:18 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-03 15:28 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170702123621.67df4ae7@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox