From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 18:16:53 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4 v2] package/kvm-unit-tests: introduce _ARCH_SUPPORTS In-Reply-To: <20170709180305.5146f312@windsurf> References: <0d5c040b902f29f870a4a941f1850d7c29e43144.1499522760.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20170708163045.GD3867@scaer> <20170709180305.5146f312@windsurf> Message-ID: <20170709161653.GE3196@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2017-07-09 18:03 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 18:30:45 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > GCC is *not* an arch dependency, so this should just be > > Yet we already use similar construct in other packages, like [...] [--SNIP--] > > Arguaby, none of the above have a dependency on gcc, but some are on the > > C library, and others are on toolchain features... > > Yes, but see what I replied to Carlos about adding a > BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX_PAM_ARCH_SUPPORTS option, which would have encoded > non-architecture dependencies. And it looks like I agree as I addressed Arnout's comment in v3. ;-) I was just pointing out that we are not entirely consistent with this rule, as some packages have such non-arch dependencies in their _ARCH_SUPPORT symbols. I'll try to find some time to fix them. :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'