From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:25:54 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] efivar: bump to version 31 In-Reply-To: <20170711161054.qhsr2glldmil6uzt@tarshish> References: <20170711155957.10815-1-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20170711155957.10815-2-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20170711161054.qhsr2glldmil6uzt@tarshish> Message-ID: <20170711182554.7677e18e@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:10:54 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:59:56PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > This allows to drop two patches that have been upstreamed: > > > > 0001-Use-z-muldefs-to-avoid-the-multiple-definitions-bug-.patch is > > upstream as of commit 18b9b3dd7ebf23a16de07b3fb6ae622be488d712 > > > > 0003-Remove-some-extra-const-that-gcc-complains-about.patch is > > upstream as of commit 1c7c0f71c9d22efda4156881eb187b8c69d1cca7. > > Version 31 is marked as pre-release[1], like 29 and 25 before. It seems like > only even version numbers are stable releases. OK, good point, I didn't notice that. So it was really a good idea to split PATCH 1/3 that adds just the gcc 7.x fix from the rest of the series. I'll apply PATCH 1/3 and reject PATCH 2/3 and 3/3. Is that OK for you? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com