From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:21:07 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] configs/arcturus_ucp1020_defconfig In-Reply-To: References: <20170712183103.30139-1-oleks@arcturusnetworks.com> <20170713094219.1750fab7@windsurf.orange-hotspot.com> <20170713153809.5d51faba@windsurf.orange-hotspot.com> <20170713173340.47f16bde@windsurf.lan> Message-ID: <20170713192107.3d951b53@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:20:54 -0400, Oleksandr G Zhadan wrote: > Looks like we mixed two architectures: > > We have arcturus_ucp1020_defconfig (board/arcturus/ppc-ucp1020) already > in buildroot tree for a while and we been using public kernel with our > patches. > Recently I tested the build of it and found that with latest GCC-6 we > have an issue to build image for this existing board (uCP1020), but it > was building OK when the latest was GCC-4.9. I agree with you that it > is better to port GCC-6 issue fix and use GCC-6, I already tested it > here and will added that linux-3.18 patch into my board patch directory. > The updated patch for uCP1020 I will send soon. > > The arcturus_ucls1012a_defconfig (board/arcturus/aarch64-ucls1012a) is > another board support package we are trying to add to buildroot now. > And in patches for this board we are using > "BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_TARBALL_LOCATION="https://www.arcturusnetworks.com/OSS/kernel-ucls1012a-170706-13.tar.gz". > The v4 of the patch for uCLS1012a is waiting for your approval. Indeed, I got confused by the two defconfigs. Thanks for clarifying the situation! Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com