From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] binutils: add support for binutils 2.29
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:34:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170729213400.566ef659@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170729181554.GF28707@waldemar-brodkorb.de>
Hello,
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:15:54 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > All patches from binutils 2.28 are kept, except patch
> > 0906-microblaze-pr21180.patch, because it has been merged upstream as
> > of commit bd757ca7bf5886a4025ca02093fca1b8c5ce11a2. Other patches are
> > slightly adapted to differences that appeared in binutils 2.29.
> >
> > The patches are now all Git formatted, so instead of having weird
> > sequence numbers, they have normal sequence numbers starting from 0001
> > and incrementing.
> >
> > Since binutils 2.29 is now available as a .tar.xz tarball, we use this
> > format instead of .bz2 used for previous versions.
>
> I am testing some more qemu defconfigs with binutils 2.29.
> sh4/sparc worked fine. But xtensa fails to compile busybox:
>
> /home/wbx/buildroot/output/host/lib/gcc/xtensa-buildroot-linux-uclibc/6.4.0/../../../../xtensa-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
> BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.29 assertion fail elf32-xtensa.c:3965
>
> Adding Max to Cc.
Thanks!
Since we're not switching to 2.29 as the default, I think it's fine if
some architectures have a few issues with 2.29. The whole point of
adding new versions before making them the default is precisely to iron
out such issues.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-29 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-29 13:09 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Update binutils package Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] binutils: bump 2.28.x series to 2.28.1 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] binutils: add support for binutils 2.29 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 18:15 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-07-29 19:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-08-02 18:43 ` Max Filippov
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] binutils: switch to use 2.28.x as the default version Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] binutils: remove support for 2.26 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-31 19:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Update binutils package Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-31 19:29 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-08-01 21:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170729213400.566ef659@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox