From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:54:47 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] whois: bump to version 5.2.17 In-Reply-To: References: <37040459db3e6ca01e2dc8236cf57a993f1831ed.1502649259.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20170815041832.jyuew657zabwrplz@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20170815104048.28e8d41f@windsurf> Message-ID: <20170815125447.3fea4ad8@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:12:01 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > Indeed, if it's a patch series, we > > expect the submitter to resend a complete new iteration of the series, > > even if some patches remain unchanged. > > But in this case, there are in fact no changes requested in the series (or > rather, the request has been refuted). So I've changed the status back to New. Doh? Why? My comments still stand. It's not because Baruch said Debian is a better upstream than the real upstream that I agree with his comments. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com