From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] support/script/check-bin-arch: ignore /usr/lib/grub
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:55:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816235547.01799dae@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ff5a5e7-a7bd-c4e2-9dcb-a2953f2f3790@igneoussystems.com>
Hello,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:42:04 -0700, Andrew Pilloud wrote:
> The grub2 package that ships with buildroot does not install the grub2
> tools or modules in the target. I have a version of the grub2 package
> that does install the tools and modules in the target in my EXTERNAL
> tree.
OK. Why would the grub2 tools be built for a different architecture
than the target architecture ?
I do understand that grub2 modules can be built 32-bit, while the
target is 64-bit. But the grub2 tools ?
> (I could submit a patch to make that an option on the grub2
> package that ships with buildroot.) As best as I can tell, there is no
> way for a package to request specific files or folders be exempt from
> this check. There also doesn't appear to be a way to disable the test.
For your information, Erico Nunes has submitted a patch series on
grub2, which includes adding a grub2-tools package, that allows
installing the grub2 tools to the target. See:
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/8] grub2-tools: new package
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:39:47 +0200
in the mailing list archives. It hasn't been merged yet, as some
comments were made, but it's definitely something we want to merge
ultimately.
Regarding the ability for a package to specify some folders to be
excluded from the architecture check, we indeed did not implement such
a thing because there was no real need so far. What you're bringing is
really the first package-specific exclusion, so I think we would still
prefer to handle it in check-bin-arch for now rather than adding a more
involved mechanism.
However, I'm not a big fan of adding such a exclusion in check-bin-arch
if there is no package in Buildroot that installs stuff
in /usr/lib/grub that makes the exclusion needed.
Could you work with Erico Nunes, and get your grub2 patches upstream?
Adding the exclusion to check-bin-arch would then of course be part of
such a patch series, and would be accepted with no problem.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-16 17:39 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] support/script/check-bin-arch: ignore /usr/lib/grub Andrew Pilloud
2017-08-16 21:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-16 21:42 ` Andrew Pilloud
2017-08-16 21:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170816235547.01799dae@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox