From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Fixing cc-tool build issue: anyone understanding the Boost build system?
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:05:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818160537.07c954f7@windsurf> (raw)
Hello,
I started investigating a cc-tool build issue on m68k coldfire, i.e:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e30/e30a1cda39e996309a56e4ae23ad210356df4b03/build-end.log.
It fails with:
/home/peko/autobuild/instance-1/output/host/m68k-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libboost_program_options.a(options_description.o): In function `boost::program_options::options_description_easy_init::operator()(char const*, char const*)':
options_description.cpp:(.text+0x3cbc): undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4'
I.e, this means that the Boost program-options module is using
__sync_fetch_and_add_4, which isn't provided on m68k Coldfire.
Diving into the Boost source code, one can see in
boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base.hpp that there is some support
for various ways of doing atomic operations. On m68k Coldfire, we fall
into this case:
#elif !defined( BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC )
# include <boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_std_atomic.hpp>
I.e we don't have BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC defined (beware of the
inverted logic). So, Boost believes that C++11 atomics are available.
Grepping for BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC in the tree, one can find
libs/config/test/boost_no_cxx11_hdr_atomic.ipp which seems to be a test
program to validate if C++11 atomics are available or not.
However adding random #error in this file never breaks the build, so it
looks as if this file is not built ? Does anyone understand how the
Boost build system works, and how it decides if
BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC should be defined or not ? Are there some
logs available where I can see if this file got built or not, and what
was the result ?
For the record, a very simple program using C++11 atomics doesn't build
on m68k Coldfire:
thomas at windsurf:~/projets/buildroot (master)$ cat toto.cpp
#include <atomic>
int main()
{
std::atomic<int> a;
a.store(1);
a.fetch_add(2);
return 0;
}
thomas at windsurf:~/projets/buildroot (master)$ ./output/host/usr/bin/m68k-linux-gcc -o toto toto.cpp
/tmp/ccLZZMR8.o: In function `main':
toto.cpp:(.text+0x60): undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Therefore, I would expect Boost configuration to define
BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC. This way, it would fall back on a different
atomic implementation (potentially based on pthread locks) and the
build would work fine.
Anybody has a clue ?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818160537.07c954f7@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox