From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: needs kernel headers >= 4.5 on mips(64)
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:26:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170820222602.1f51bd7c@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170820144154.15347-1-romain.naour@gmail.com>
Hello,
+Vicente, since the discussion is MIPS related.
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:41:54 +0200, Romain Naour wrote:
> I tried to use BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008 but it trigger a circular dependency in Kconfig.
I indeed tried:
diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
index f47001f..9b25809 100644
--- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
+++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC
BR2_microblaze || BR2_nios2
depends on BR2_USE_MMU
depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS
- depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2
+ depends on (BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2 && !BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008) || \
+ (BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_5 && BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008)
depends on !BR2_powerpc_SPE
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
# our glibc.mk enables RPC support
@@ -63,8 +64,14 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC
comment "glibc needs a toolchain w/ dynamic library, kernel headers >= 3.2"
depends on BR2_USE_MMU
+ depends on !BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008
depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2
+comment "glibc needs a toolchain w/ dynamic library, kernel headers >= 4.5"
+ depends on BR2_USE_MMU
+ depends on BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008
+ depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_5
+
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL
bool "musl"
depends on BR2_aarch64 || BR2_arm || BR2_armeb || BR2_i386 || \
And Kconfig yells with:
toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in:23:error: recursive dependency detected!
toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in:23: choice <choice> contains symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC
toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in:43: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC depends on BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008
arch/Config.in.mips:168: symbol BR2_MIPS_NAN_2008 is selected by BR2_MIPS_ENABLE_NAN_2008
arch/Config.in.mips:185: symbol BR2_MIPS_ENABLE_NAN_2008 is part of choice <choice>
arch/Config.in.mips:171: choice <choice> contains symbol <choice>
arch/Config.in.mips:171: choice <choice> contains symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_MNAN_OPTION
toolchain/toolchain-common.in:347: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_MNAN_OPTION depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
toolchain/toolchain-common.in:314: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 is selected by BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
toolchain/toolchain-common.in:318: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5 is selected by BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
toolchain/toolchain-common.in:322: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_6 is selected by BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
toolchain/toolchain-common.in:326: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 is selected by BR2_GCC_VERSION_7_X
package/gcc/Config.in.host:68: symbol BR2_GCC_VERSION_7_X is part of choice <choice>
package/gcc/Config.in.host:3: choice <choice> contains symbol BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_9_X
package/gcc/Config.in.host:23: symbol BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_9_X depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL
toolchain/Config.in:25: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL is selected by BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL
toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in:75: symbol BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL is part of choice <choice>
And I believe he is right to yell about this. I think the addition of
the BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_<xyz>_OPTION dependencies in arch/Config.in.mips
is what causes the problem. Indeed, it's the first time we have a
dependency on an architecture option to a toolchain option. This is not
logical, because in Buildroot, you first select the architecture, and
then you select the toolchain details. For example, we disallow
selecting a given gcc version if it is not supported on a given
architecture. But here, those BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_MFPXX_OPTION /
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_MNAN_OPTION are doing the opposite: they prevent you
from selecting a given architecture variant if the gcc version is not
sufficient.
I believe we need to invert those dependencies, and instead have a
mechanism where selecting a too old gcc version is not possible when
-mnan/-mfp are used on MIPS.
Yann is specifically working on a mechanism to allow architectures to
describe what minimum gcc version they need. Perhaps we should use that
to express this dependency as well. Adding Yann in Cc :)
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-20 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-20 14:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: needs kernel headers >= 4.5 on mips(64) Romain Naour
2017-08-20 20:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-08-21 16:28 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-08-21 21:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-22 16:34 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-08-24 21:33 ` Romain Naour
2017-08-29 21:09 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170820222602.1f51bd7c@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox