From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 23:15:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/3] package/freeswitch-mod-bcg729: new package In-Reply-To: <20171006202829.431-2-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> References: <20171006202829.431-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20171006202829.431-2-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> Message-ID: <20171008231501.793fdb96@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 22:28:28 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > This package is based on the bcg729 library from Belledonne Communica- > tions which is wrapped into a freeswitch module to provide a native > G729.A codec. > > Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls > Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) > --- > v4: added dependency to !BR2_STATIC_LIBS (Arnout), added license hash > v3: bumped to latest version > v2: renamed package from freeswitch_mod_bcg729 to freeswitch-mod-bcg729 > (Thomas) Do be honest, I am not a big fan of the compile commands inside Buildroot's .mk file. Wouldn't it be possible to patch the package build system and get the patches merged upstream, if there is an active upstream of course? That being said, since there has been prior discussion with Arnout on this, I'll assume the pros/cons have been weighted, so I've applied. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com