From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Discussion on per-package logging
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:55:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171011115548.7c8172ff@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <995022ba-f346-09be-8f8b-9e64699cc242@mind.be>
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:05:06 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> For the record (since I'm sure this must have been discussed before), why isn't
> the --output-sync option sufficient? Output from parallel make is expected to be
> garbled in any parallel build. When a user calls 'make -j', we can expect them
> to also provide --output-sync=recurse option.
Ah, I indeed forgot to cover the -O/--output-sync option. The drawback
with -Orecurse is that you don't see anything happening for the entire
duration of a given package build step. Also I'm not sure if the ">>>
foo 1.0 Building" message will actually be grouped with the build of
that package, which makes the analysis of the build output a bit
difficult.
I'll do a bit of testing and report.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 8:58 [Buildroot] Discussion on per-package logging Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-11 9:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-11 9:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-10-11 13:08 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-10-11 13:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-11 14:10 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-10-16 16:20 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC] core: enable per-package log files Anisse Astier
2017-10-16 16:23 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-16 16:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-16 21:18 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-17 7:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-17 12:01 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-17 12:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-17 14:44 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-17 19:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-17 23:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-18 6:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 7:44 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-18 7:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 8:09 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-18 8:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 9:05 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-18 9:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 10:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-18 11:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 10:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-18 11:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 17:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-10-17 15:45 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-17 22:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-10-18 6:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-18 7:34 ` Anisse Astier
2017-10-17 15:53 ` Anisse Astier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171011115548.7c8172ff@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox