From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:24:39 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1] qt5base: add 3rdparty/harfbuzz-ng
 license file hash
In-Reply-To: <0af4065c-c126-fab5-82cc-b95d07114267@mind.be>
References: <20171023174458.15127-1-ps.report@gmx.net>
 <0af4065c-c126-fab5-82cc-b95d07114267@mind.be>
Message-ID: <20171106222439.2467dcf1@gmx.net>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hello Arnout,

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 15:59:14 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:

> On 23-10-17 19:44, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>  
> 
>  Applied to master, thanks.
> 
>  You're building qt5 on sparc or m68k then? Those are the only platforms where
> the internal harfbuzz (and thus this license file) will be used...

No, I am a ordinary ARM user (mostly)...., but in between the first version
of the qt5base/harfbuzz patch and the commit lately the license file hash
check was introduced ;-)

Regards,
Peter

> 
>  Regards,
>  Arnout
> 
> > ---
> >  package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base.hash | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base.hash b/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base.hash
> > index 2a073d4753..4883484d5b 100644
> > --- a/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base.hash
> > +++ b/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base.hash
> > @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ sha256 0dbe024961f6ab5c52689cbd036c977975d0d0f6a67ff97762d96cb819dd5652 LICENSE.
> >  sha256 68afaf3392f8c04218fbf29db43cc0b18bf651c1db086556aa584046de9f3e35 LICENSE.LGPLv3
> >  sha256 ed8742a95cb9db653a09b050e27ccff5e67ba69c14aa2c3137f2a4e1892f6c0d LICENSE.FDL
> >  sha256 8fdefa0b45d9f791f687da6c2c4c83c1b701aaee2c08008f55d522af214b88f0 header.BSD
> > +sha256 2a886915de4f296cdae5ed67064f86dba01d0c55286d86e8487f2a5caaf40216 src/3rdparty/harfbuzz-ng/COPYING
> >   
>