From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFCv1 0/4] Per-package SDK and target directories
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:55:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107205558.315ce04c@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d79b315e-3ccd-5da3-4794-7ea97a296c0d@mind.be>
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:55:20 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > in package/pkg-generic.mk. But of course, we need to exclude the
> > host-ccache package from this, otherwise we would have a circular
> > dependency. Do you want to try something like this?
>
> Ha, I didn't understand the original problem but now I see. The issue is that
> ccache is part of DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ, and DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ is
> *not* added to each package's DEPENDENCIES,
Exactly.
> instead it is added to the
> core-dependencies target and each package depends on that. It's an easy way to
> avoid circular dependencies, I guess.
>
> So I think the proper solution would be to add DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ to the
> dependencies of all packages except themselves, similar to how it's done for
> toolchain.
Isn't this DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ thing a bit crappy in the first
place? Why isn't host-ccache simply added as a dependency of all
packages, except itself?
Another example is that today, host-lzip is always built at the
beginning of build, even if you're not building any package that needs
the lzip "decompressor".
So perhaps this calls for a little bit of rework in this area, no?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5DBA847110A28B46BBA17BE675F0C9B2181A8D38@cnshjmbx01>
2017-11-07 17:13 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 0/4] Per-package SDK and target directories Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 17:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 19:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-07 20:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-09 5:02 ` Chu, Zhuliang
2017-11-11 10:20 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-09 4:32 ` Chu, Zhuliang
2017-11-11 10:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-15 8:59 ` Chu, Zhuliang
2017-11-08 16:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-09 4:44 ` Chu, Zhuliang
2017-11-08 17:29 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-08 18:35 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2017-11-09 8:19 ` Chu, Zhuliang
2017-11-03 16:06 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 23:21 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171107205558.315ce04c@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox