Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFCv1 2/4] core: change host RPATH handling
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:41:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107234118.177ed856@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171105085756.GG2996@scaer>

Hello,

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 09:57:56 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:

> > An alternative strategy would have been to keep the
> > -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the
> > host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every
> > package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the
> > installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.  
> 
> I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.

OK, to time this, I did a quick hacky shell script
(http://code.bulix.org/uboevd-223829). What it does is:

 - Generate a mix of ELF files and random data files (half of the files
   are ELF files, half are random data files). This is the "generate"
   target of the script.

 - Fixup rpath to $ORIGIN/../lib if not already fixed. We don't want to
   fixup files repeatedly, as we don't want to duplicate files over and
   over by breaking hard links. So we really want to set the RPATH only
   once per binary.

Results are as follows:

$ ./rpath-evaluation.sh generate 0 500
... generate 250 random data files, 250 ELF programs with a crappy
rpath ...

$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixup

real	0m0.976s
user	0m0.546s
sys	0m0.457s
$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixup

real	0m0.610s
user	0m0.393s
sys	0m0.234s

So the first fixup pass, which actually fixes the RPATH of 250 binaries
takes about one second. The next fixup pass doesn't do anything, except
checking that all binaries already have a fixed RPATH.

So we see that it will take ~600ms to scan 500 files, provided half
of them are ELF files, verify that they already have the correct RPATH.

To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 16:06 [Buildroot] [RFCv1 0/4] Per-package SDK and target directories Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 16:06 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 1/4] pkgconf: use relative path to STAGING_DIR instead of absolute path Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 21:05   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-03 16:06 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 2/4] core: change host RPATH handling Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05  8:57   ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-05 14:44     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05 14:48       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 22:41     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-07 23:50       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-08  8:55         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-08 10:55           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-08 12:30             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-08 12:38               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 21:15   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 21:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 23:45       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-03 16:06 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 3/4] toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 21:23   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 21:33     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 23:49       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-03 16:06 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 4/4] core: implement per-package SDK and target Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 22:50   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-07 23:11     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-07 23:57       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-24 14:49         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-24 14:43     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-25 17:30       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-25 20:01         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-27 14:23           ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-07 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 0/4] Per-package SDK and target directories Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171107234118.177ed856@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox