From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:00:55 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 1/2] package/dovecot: bump version to 2.2.33.2 In-Reply-To: <20171114072203.yznumdrkiad5xtwj@tarshish> References: <20171114065151.24659-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20171114072203.yznumdrkiad5xtwj@tarshish> Message-ID: <20171123220055.3be02c93@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:22:03 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > > DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR = 2.2 > > -DOVECOT_VERSION = $(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR).31 > > +DOVECOT_VERSION = $(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR).33.2 > > DOVECOT_SITE = http://www.dovecot.org/releases/$(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR) > > DOVECOT_INSTALL_STAGING = YES > > DOVECOT_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1 > > Unrelated to this patch, but since COPYING.MIT is one of the license files, > why isn't the MIT license mentioned here? Good catch. The COPYING file explains pretty well was going on here. It says: """ Everything in src/lib/, src/auth/, src/lib-sql/ and src/lib-ntlm/ is under MIT license (see COPYING.MIT) unless otherwise mentioned at the beginning of the file. Everything else is LGPLv2.1 (see COPYING.LGPL) unless otherwise mentioned at the beginning of the file. Current exceptions are: src/lib/md5.c : Public Domain src/lib/sha1.c and sha2.c: [... here the next of BSD-3c] src/lib/UnicodeData.txt: [... something that looks very similar to https://spdx.org/licenses/Unicode-DFS-2015.html, but isn't exactly the same ...] So perhaps: DOVECOT_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1, MIT, Public Domain, Unicode-DFS-2015 something like that ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com