From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:48:33 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes In-Reply-To: <20171123210734.z2n7xeretrwy2tdu@archlinux> References: <20171119015458.6725-1-gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com> <20171123213242.417dbb47@windsurf.lan> <20171123210734.z2n7xeretrwy2tdu@archlinux> Message-ID: <20171123224833.562c69d3@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:07:34 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:54:58 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Ga?l PORTAY > > > --- > > > Hi, > > > > Applied to next, thanks. > > > > Thomas > > -- > > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > > http://free-electrons.com > > Thanks, Thanks a lot for your "thanks", but it's not really needed to thank back the maintainers when they merge a patch. We already have three e-mails per patches on the list: - One with the patch itself - One sent by Git when the commit is merged/pushed - One sent by the maintainer to notify the author that the patch was merged. I don't think it's really useful to add a fourth patch with the contributor thanking the maintainer. Just pay a beer to one of the maintainers the next time you see him :-) Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com