Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] or1k system calls appear broken
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 20:28:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171207192839.GG27558@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171206224419.GC2890@lianli.shorne-pla.net>

Hi,
Stafford Horne wrote,

> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 07:20:00PM +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Hi Stafford,
> > Stafford Horne wrote,
> > 
> > > I was thinking we can just update : libc/sysdeps/linux/common/syscall.c
> > > 
> > > There is not much openrisc specific about this.  But it's up to Waldemar.
> > 
> > What are the advantages or disadvantages using it in
> > common/syscall.c?
> 
> The advantages would be that the code is generic enough to work for any
> architecture, reducing code needed for porting.  Also the implementation
> arguments will match the header delared arguments.
> 
> > Does it might break support for existing architectures using no
> > special syscall.c/syscall.S?
> 
> I dont think so, but some possible downsides:
>   - if those architectures have buggy handling of vargs it will have issues
>   - the varargs code might be sub optimal compared to the regular args code
> 
> I did a quick audit of some of the other syscall.c implementation so see if any
> other architectures use generic c code.
> 
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/common/syscall.c   COMMON generic implementation
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/syscall.c      Same as COMMON
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/hppa/syscall.c     varargs + asm
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/frv/syscall.c      asm
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/c6x/syscall.c      varargs + asm
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/nds32/syscall.c    GENERIC varargs (7 args?)
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/syscall.c      asm
>     ./libc/sysdeps/linux/metag/syscall.c    asm
> 
> So it looks like we could remove the arc and nds32 syscall.c files as they are
> generic.
> 
> The architectures using the common syscall.c are:
> 
>   bfin
>   h8300
>   lm32
>   m68k
>   microblaze
>   nios2
>   or1k
>   sh
> 
> If we feel we dont have good test coverage for these then maybe its best we just
> add this as a OR1K only file as per Joel's patch.

I checked the test suite and no syscall() is used.
Would it be possible for you to suggest a test case for syscall()?

Then I can run the tests for all architectures, where I can do
runtime testing.

best regards
 Waldemar

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-07 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-20 13:09 [Buildroot] or1k system calls appear broken Joel Stanley
2017-11-21  3:56 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
     [not found]   ` <20171121092441.GW29237@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
2017-11-21 19:56     ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-11-28  6:49 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-12-06  0:41   ` Stafford Horne
2017-12-06 12:38     ` Joel Stanley
2017-12-06 12:55       ` Stafford Horne
2017-12-06 18:20         ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-12-06 22:44           ` Stafford Horne
2017-12-07 19:28             ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
2017-12-07 19:33               ` Max Filippov
2017-12-10 10:17                 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-12-10 11:10                   ` Stafford Horne
2017-12-12 19:37                     ` Waldemar Brodkorb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171207192839.GG27558@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
    --to=wbx@openadk.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox