From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 8/8] cargo: new package
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:32:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171228223238.69698252@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171228155146.18193-9-eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Hello,
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:51:46 +0100, Eric Le Bihan wrote:
> This new package provides Cargo, the Rust official package manager.
> Cargo is written in Rust and uses Cargo as its build system. It also
> depends on other Rust packages.
>
> Normally, a previously installed version of Cargo would be used to:
>
> 1. Fetch the dependencies.
> 2. Build the new version of Cargo, using the available Rust compiler.
>
> But the fetching step prevents offline builds. So instead two features
> of Cargo are levelled: vendoring [1] and local registry.
Did you want to say "leveraged" instead of "levelled" ?
> diff --git a/package/cargo/Config.in.host b/package/cargo/Config.in.host
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..0f1ca305c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/cargo/Config.in.host
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_CARGO
> + bool "host cargo"
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_HOST_RUSTC
> + help
> + Cargo is the package manager for the Rust programming
> + language.
> +
> + https://crates.io/
How would "host cargo" be used in the context of Buildroot ? Would it
be used by packages that are written in Rust as part of their build
process ? What would such packages look like ?
> diff --git a/package/cargo/cargo.hash b/package/cargo/cargo.hash
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..2b2ae43f6b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/cargo/cargo.hash
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +# Locally generated
> +sha256 f4bbe2a8719dbb8da20842235093f7f70f034d01633189e83f75897d68cd274f cargo-0.23.0.tar.gz
> +sha512 9060ec6e67b54f7fad7da8dd8450dd051d62b3f8ed4606196fc238a98beba1c3b43087c787f35d012d9b641c8572e70f50b95b0e01fdd75ed82932b6e6efbbf0 cargo-0.23.0-vendor.tar.xz
> +sha256 dc7240d60a869fa24a68c8734fb7c810c27cca0a6dad52df6279865e4e8e7fae rust-installer-4f994850808a572e2cc8d43f968893c8e942e9bf.tar.gz
Why are you using sha256 sometimes, and sha512 sometimes? Seems like
for the cargo-0.23.0-vendor tarball, the hash is not exactly locally
generated, but really comes from upstream.
> +HOST_CARGO_DEPENDENCIES = \
> + host-cmake \
Do you need host-cmake absolutely here, or can you use
$(BR2_CMAKE_HOST_DEPENDENCY) instead ?
> + host-pkgconf \
> + host-openssl \
> + host-libhttpparser \
> + host-libssh2 \
> + host-libcurl \
> + host-rustc \
> + host-cargo-bin
> +
> +HOST_CARGO_SNAP_BIN = $(HOST_CARGO_BIN_DIR)/cargo/bin/cargo
> +HOST_CARGO_HOME = $(HOST_DIR)/share/cargo
> +
> +define HOST_CARGO_EXTRACT_DEPS
> + @mkdir -p $(@D)/vendor
> + $(call suitable-extractor,$(CARGO_DEPS_SOURCE)) \
> + $(DL_DIR)/$(CARGO_DEPS_SOURCE) | \
> + $(TAR) --strip-components=1 -C $(@D)/vendor $(TAR_OPTIONS) -
> +endef
> +
> +HOST_CARGO_POST_EXTRACT_HOOKS += HOST_CARGO_EXTRACT_DEPS
> +
> +define HOST_CARGO_EXTRACT_INSTALLER
> + @mkdir -p $(@D)/src/rust-installer
> + $(call suitable-extractor,$(CARGO_INSTALLER_SOURCE)) \
> + $(DL_DIR)/$(CARGO_INSTALLER_SOURCE) | \
> + $(TAR) --strip-components=1 -C $(@D)/src/rust-installer $(TAR_OPTIONS) -
> +endef
> +
> +HOST_CARGO_POST_EXTRACT_HOOKS += HOST_CARGO_EXTRACT_INSTALLER
> +
> +define HOST_CARGO_SETUP_DEPS
> + mkdir -p $(@D)/.cargo
> + ( \
> + echo "[source.crates-io]"; \
> + echo "registry = 'https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index'"; \
> + echo "replace-with = 'vendored-sources'"; \
> + echo "[source.vendored-sources]"; \
> + echo "directory = '$(@D)/vendor'"; \
> + ) > $(@D)/.cargo/config
> +endef
> +
> +HOST_CARGO_PRE_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += HOST_CARGO_SETUP_DEPS
> +
> +HOST_CARGO_SNAP_OPTS = --release
> +HOST_CARGO_SNAP_OPTS += $(if $(VERBOSE),--verbose)
A single assignment would be prettier:
HOST_CARGO_SNAP_OPTS = \
--release \
$(if $(VERBOSE),--verbose)
> +HOST_CARGO_ENV = \
> + RUSTFLAGS="-Clink-arg=-Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib" \
> + CARGO_HOME=$(HOST_DIR)/share/cargo
Why don't you use $(HOST_CARGO_HOME) here ?
> +define HOST_CARGO_BUILD_CMDS
> + (cd $(@D); $(HOST_MAKE_ENV) $(HOST_CARGO_ENV) $(HOST_CARGO_SNAP_BIN) \
> + build $(HOST_CARGO_SNAP_OPTS))
> +endef
> +
> +define HOST_CARGO_INSTALL_CMDS
> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 0755 $(HOST_DIR)/bin
This is not needed, just use the -D option in the command command
installing the cargo binary.
> + $(INSTALL) -m 0755 $(@D)/target/release/cargo $(HOST_DIR)/bin/cargo
> +endef
> +
> +define HOST_CARGO_INSTALL_CONF_FILE
> + $(INSTALL) -D package/cargo/config.in \
> + $(HOST_DIR)/share/cargo/config
> + $(SED) 's/@RUST_TARGET_NAME@/$(RUST_TARGET_NAME)/' \
> + $(HOST_DIR)/share/cargo/config
> + $(SED) 's/@CROSS_PREFIX@/$(notdir $(TARGET_CROSS))/' \
> + $(HOST_DIR)/share/cargo/config
This should be moved inside HOST_CARGO_INSTALL_CMDS, there is no need
for a separate post-install hook.
Also, I'm wondering of your choice between generating config files from
the .mk file, or having a template that gets tweaked using SED. In this
cargo.mk, you are producing a 5 lines file in HOST_CARGO_SETUP_DEPS
where only a single value varies (and would need to be tweaked with
sed). But on the other hand, you create a two lines share/cargo/config
file from a template. Perhaps we should settle on one or the other
solution ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-28 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 15:51 [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add support for the Rust programming Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 1/8] rustc: new virtual package Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 16:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-01 16:11 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 2/8] rust-bin: new package Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 20:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-01 20:13 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 3/8] cargo-bin: " Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 20:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-01 20:14 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 4/8] rust: " Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-01 20:23 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 5/8] libssh2: add host variant Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 6/8] libhttpparser: " Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 7/8] libcurl: " Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-12-28 15:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 8/8] cargo: new package Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-01-02 17:49 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 16:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add support for the Rust programming Thomas Petazzoni
2017-12-28 17:52 ` Eric Le Bihan
2017-12-28 21:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-02 17:51 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-01-18 7:48 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-01-18 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-18 22:41 ` Eric Le Bihan
2018-01-19 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-22 21:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171228223238.69698252@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox