From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 15:35:18 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] nilfs-utils: need NPTL threads In-Reply-To: <1515060652-22472-1-git-send-email-dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be> References: <1515060652-22472-1-git-send-email-dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Message-ID: <20180106153518.2fa78e98@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:10:51 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > nilfs-utils use clock_nanosleep(), which comes with NPTL threads > > Signed-off-by: Kurt Van Dijck > --- > package/nilfs-utils/Config.in | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in b/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in > index 0c6b7a0..9dda27c 100644 > --- a/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in > +++ b/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > config BR2_PACKAGE_NILFS_UTILS > bool "nilfs-utils" > depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS # sem_open() > + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL # clock_nanosleep() > depends on BR2_USE_MMU # util-linux libmount, libblkid > select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBUUID > select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBBLKID You forgot to update the Config.in comment accordingly. Also, I've updated the commit log to summarize why we keep both the threads *and* NPTL dependencies, even though it might look redundant. Applied with those changes. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com