From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:47:26 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] open-lldp: new package In-Reply-To: <276755364.2420280.1516020636845@mail.yahoo.com> References: <20180112140107.15301-1-laurent_pubs@yahoo.com> <20180112220436.677e3084@windsurf.lan> <20180112233842.388e29a0@windsurf.lan> <276755364.2420280.1516020636845@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20180115144726.02c4bbd1@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:50:36 +0000 (UTC), Laurent Charpentier wrote: > Here are some experiments on my side.(1) AUTORECONF=yes (no use of ./bootstrap.sh)-> ./configure fails > (2) (cd $(@D) && PATH=$(BR_PATH) ./bootstrap.sh) (no use of AUTORECONF)-> run OK (configure passed, build passed) > (3) AUTORECONF=yes and (cd $(@D) &&?./bootstrap.sh)-> run OK (configure passed, build passed) > I would like to use choice (2). This choice is similar to the RPM packaging (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/lldpad.git/tree/lldpad.spec) and follows the guidelines in the README file. Choice (2) alone is wrong, because you won't have the dependency on host-autoconf, host-automake and host-libtool. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com