From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Suggestion for Makefile to probably import BR2_CONFIG
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:11:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180129091113.3acccd2c@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be14460d-9241-e14a-d4f1-8c30a62d7451@mind.be>
Hello,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 23:30:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 7d8ab51..4b12359 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > ?# Pull in the user's configuration file
> > @@ -547,7 +550,7 @@ dirs: $(BUILD_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) \
> > ??????? $(HOST_DIR) $(HOST_DIR)/usr $(HOST_DIR)/lib $(BINARIES_DIR)
> > ?
> > ?$(BUILD_DIR)/buildroot-config/auto.conf: $(BR2_CONFIG)
> > -?????? $(MAKE1) $(EXTRAMAKEARGS) HOSTCC="$(HOSTCC_NOCCACHE)"
> > HOSTCXX="$(HOSTCXX_NOCCACHE)" silentoldconfig
> > +?????? $(MAKE1) BR2_CONFIG=$(BR2_CONFIG) $(EXTRAMAKEARGS)
> > HOSTCC="$(HOSTCC_NOCCACHE)" HOSTCXX="$(HOSTCXX_NOCCACHE)" silentoldconfig
>
> It would indeed make sense to pass all options pertaining to Kconfig explicitly
> to the silentoldconfig call.
>
> However, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to remove this auto.conf handling
> entirely. It is supposed to make sure that silendoldconfig gets run whenever
> something changed in Config.in files. But for that to work, we need to actually
> include the auto.conf file in the Makefile. Looking at what's done in the
> kernel, it seems there would be a lot more changes needed to get this right. And
> even then, I think there's still a risk to not get things fully right - e.g.
> changes in the host environment will not be detected.
>
> The only commit pertaining to this auto.conf dependency that I could find is
> commit 0b36880085f0c65286877853caccf0bde2dd7f0b, from 2010. Quoting its commit
> message:
>
> The previous commit has removed calls to conf_write_autoconf(), which
> is the function that generates the KCONFIG_AUTOCONF,
> KCONFIG_AUTOHEADER, KCONFIG_TRISTATE files and the split config (with
> one file per config item). Therefore, those things were not generated
> anymore before the build.
>
> In order to get them generated before the build, we use the same
> mechanism as the kernel: run a silentoldconfig when the .config file
> is newer than the KCONFIG_AUTOCONF file.
>
> In Buildroot, all those elements are not really used today, except the
> split config which is used a little bit in the toolchain build, in a
> try to make sure the toolchain gets rebuilt properly when the
> configuration changes. It does not seem that this work has been
> completed.
>
> However, as we want to keep the same behaviour as previously, we have
> to generate all those elements before starting the build.
>
> So basically, the only reason to have this is to make sure this split config is
> generated, but we don't use any of it anymore.
>
>
> Yann, Thomas, Peter, what do you think?
I haven't followed the entire discussion, so maybe I'll be out of topic
here. But indeed I believe the split config is completely unused
nowadays, and could be removed entirely.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 22:06 [Buildroot] Suggestion for Makefile to probably import BR2_CONFIG Toan Pham
2018-01-19 12:49 ` Toan Pham
2018-01-22 21:45 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-01-22 23:00 ` Toan Pham
2018-01-23 9:41 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-01-23 18:28 ` Toan Pham
2018-01-26 23:45 ` Toan Pham
2018-01-28 22:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-01-29 8:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-01-29 8:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-01-30 18:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-02-07 22:29 ` Toan Pham
2018-02-10 0:02 ` Toan Pham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180129091113.3acccd2c@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox