From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:57:07 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC next] package/linux: drop useless intermediate DTS booleans In-Reply-To: <20180226174721.5785-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <20180226174721.5785-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20180226185707.75c792db@windsurf.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:47:21 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Just use whatever the user specified in the list. An empty list means no > DTS was specified. > > No need to add legacy option, as the behaviour does not change. > > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" > Cc: Simon van der Veldt > Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle > Cc: Peter Korsgaard > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni > > --- > This is an RFC patch, totally untested, as an attempt to fix the fallout > of allowing both in-tree and out-of-tree DTS files at the same time. > It's here just to kickstart a discussion, especially about the help > texts... ;-) Yes, I agree with this direction. When I saw the patch allowing to generate both in-tree and out of tree DTS, I also thought "but why do we keep those booleans". Next time I should not only "think" but also write it in an e-mail as a reply to the patch :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com