From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-03-26
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:15:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327091525.7e785751@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327064509.n3kp4rdolibyqwud@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
Hello,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:45:10 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:00:26AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Build statistics for 2018-03-26
> > ===============================
> >
> > branch | OK | NOK | TIM | TOT |
> > 2018.02.x | 194 | 10 | 0 | 204 |
>
> No reports on master. The web interface is also not showing recent master
> builds. The last master build report is from 2018-03-25 22:43:51
> (http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/990/990732326160144b71f30938beb3f208cb882ea4/).
Well spotted.
This is due to commit ea9669fffae7d807ccb3810eb6c662cbb9e8f96f, which
removed the core-dependencies target. This target is explicit used by
autobuild-run to check if the system has all necessary dependencies,
and if not, simply move on to the next build. Due to this, all master
configurations fail on "core-dependencies does not exist".
The correct target to use now is "dependencies".
However, in 2018.02.x, it's still "core-dependencies" that should be
used. Using "dependencies" in 2018.02.x would not be good, because
"dependencies" triggers the build of host-{tar,xz,ccache,lzip}, and
therefore a failure in the build of those packages would not be
reported on autobuild.b.o.
So I see two options:
(1) Re-introduce a "core-dependencies" target, that is the same as the
"dependencies" target
(2) Tweak the autobuild-run script, and make a special case depending
on the branch name: if we're on 2018.02.x, use "core-dependencies",
otherwise use "dependencies".
Arnout, Peter, any preference ? I'm leaning towards (2) since that's
the solution that doesn't pollute Buildroot with unnecessary stuff.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-27 6:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-03-26 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-27 6:45 ` Baruch Siach
2018-03-27 7:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-03-27 7:44 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-03-27 7:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-27 8:00 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180327091525.7e785751@windsurf.home \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox