From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:33:35 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] openjdk
In-Reply-To: <20180420133742.3d20ee49@windsurf.numericable.fr>
References: <20180206143952.12332-1-thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>
 <20180420133742.3d20ee49@windsurf.numericable.fr>
Message-ID: <20180420123335.GD12688@scaer>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thomas, All,

On 2018-04-20 13:37 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Tue,  6 Feb 2018 15:39:48 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> > This series is the result of some effort that was spent in the past to get
> > openjdk build without crazy dependencies on e.g. X11, cups, etc. if all you need
> > is some basic Java.

Java? Meh... ;-)

> I'm wondering what to do with this patch series. Thomas DS says it is
> not really ready for integration, and was mainly sent to help others
> who might be interested in OpenJDK.
> 
> Is there anyone interested in picking up this patch series and fixing
> the remaining issues ?
> 
> Does anyone disagrees with marking those patches as "Changes Requested"
> in patchwork ?

Sorry, I'm not really interested in pursuing that effort. So, just mark
them as RFC or Deferred... Or even Changes Requeste, as you see fit...

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'