From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] zeromq: add libatomic linkage when available
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:39:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180428153900.0f809228@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426195309.26042-1-asafka7@gmail.com>
Hello Asaf,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:53:09 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote:
> Fixes:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ff5f7d3bcd713db9c9d92a746d6ad7134748fe16
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/9a743da1c3be673288c3482a9e7ddea12750206f
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/818b12387e6117569c4fab310b98c11fac80c047
>
> If libatomic is available, it should be added to LIBS in CONF_ENV, since without
> it we can get into a state in which symbols like __atomic_fetch_sub_4,
> __atomic_compare_exchange_4 and __atomic_fetch_add_4 can't be found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com>
> ---
> package/zeromq/zeromq.mk | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/package/zeromq/zeromq.mk b/package/zeromq/zeromq.mk
> index 8273cad763..214bd9e35c 100644
> --- a/package/zeromq/zeromq.mk
> +++ b/package/zeromq/zeromq.mk
> @@ -58,4 +58,8 @@ else
> ZEROMQ_CONF_OPTS += --disable-libunwind
> endif
>
> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC),y)
> +ZEROMQ_CONF_OPTS += LIBS=-latomic
> +endif
While this does fix the problem, I don't think it's the most ideal fix.
Indeed, the solution should be upstreamed. Currently, zeromq
configure.ac uses LIBZMQ_CHECK_ATOMIC_INTRINSICS, which is implemented
in acinclude.m4, to detect the availability of atomic intrinsics.
It goes like this:
AC_DEFUN([LIBZMQ_CHECK_ATOMIC_INTRINSICS], [{
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether compiler supports __atomic_Xxx intrinsics)
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([
/* atomic intrinsics test */
int v = 0;
int main (int, char **)
{
int t = __atomic_add_fetch (&v, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
return t;
}
])],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) ; libzmq_cv_has_atomic_instrisics="yes" ; $1],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(no) ; libzmq_cv_has_atomic_instrisics="no" ; $2]
)
}])
It does only an AC_COMPILE_IFELSE(), so it succeeds on Sparc, as the
need for -latomic only appears at link time.
So I believe it should be changed to test with AC_LINK_IFELSE, and if
it fails, test with AC_LINK_IFELSE with -latomic, to determine
(1) If atomic intrinsics are available
(2) If -latomic is needed to use atomic intrinsics
Do you think you could have a look at implementing something like this ?
That being said, I agree that a number of other packages in Buildroot
are fixed by just passing LIBS=-latomic.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-28 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 19:53 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] zeromq: add libatomic linkage when available Asaf Kahlon
2018-04-28 13:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-04-29 18:40 ` Asaf Kahlon
2018-05-07 15:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180428153900.0f809228@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox