From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-04-25
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:15:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180430091509.3a9cdff2@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18cd8156-03bc-05cf-5343-dec77dbf01a9@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:15:18 +0200, Romain Naour wrote:
> > Detail of failures
> > ------------------
> >
> > microblazeel | boost | TIM | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b42d68c66d8ea035845a28c5530ef0682fd95713 |
> > microblazeel | flare-engine | TIM | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/af976a4805fb8b3f0c17a8e3a1f901b2255caa0b |
>
> I tried to reproduce this issue with the upcoming gcc 8.1 for microblaze but
> flare-engire build fine with it.
>
> git bisect helped to find a patch [1] fixing an infinite loop in RTL DSE
> optimizer. Also, back porting the patch to gcc 7.3.0 fix the issue.
>
> Since this patch is not specific to microblaze, but in gcc's code, I'm not sure
> what we need to do.
> Either back port the patch to affected gcc version and take the risk to break
> something with other architecture or optimization level.
> Or add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_85180 option and wait for gcc 8.
>
> Maybe it's easier to add an autobuilder exception for boost and flare-engine on
> microblaze?
>
> It's not clear if other architecture can be affected.
>
> Thoughts?
First of all, thanks for this investigation!
I believe we need to report this to upstream gcc (i.e that gcc 7.x is
affected) and see if they backport to the gcc 7.x branch. If they do,
then the solution is simple: also backport the patch on our side, until
they do a new 7.x release.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 6:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-04-25 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-04-29 22:15 ` Romain Naour
2018-04-30 7:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-04-30 8:17 ` Romain Naour
2018-05-09 10:21 ` Romain Naour
2018-05-10 13:24 ` Matthew Weber
2018-05-20 20:42 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-05-21 15:05 ` Matthew Weber
2018-05-21 18:10 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-05-21 18:21 ` Matthew Weber
2018-05-21 20:30 ` Matthew Weber
2018-05-08 13:23 ` Matthew Weber
2018-05-09 9:48 ` Romain Naour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180430091509.3a9cdff2@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox