[Buildroot] [PATCH] DEVELOPERS: concentrate on uClibc

[Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>]

Hi,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,

> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 22:35:12 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
> > ---
> >  DEVELOPERS | 5 -----
> >  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS
> > index 3a4ad60..45a8979 100644
> > --- a/DEVELOPERS
> > +++ b/DEVELOPERS
> > @@ -1952,11 +1952,6 @@ N:	Wade Berrier <wberrier@gmail.com>
> >  F:	package/ngrep/
> >  
> >  N:	Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
> > -F:	arch/Config.in.m68k
> > -F:	arch/Config.in.or1k
> > -F:	arch/Config.in.sparc
> > -F:	package/glibc/
> > -F:	package/mksh/
> >  F:	package/uclibc/
> >  F:	package/uclibc-ng-test/
> 
> I understand the wish to concentrate on a smaller number of topics.
> However, who is going to take care of the m68k, sparc and OpenRISC
> architecture in Buildroot? I think besides you, not many people were
> interested by those architectures, and they cause fairly frequent
> issues at the toolchain level. Do you have a proposal here ?

I keep responding on the build failure summary mails before a
release. The normal buildroot mails are more informative for me
then the summary for the architectures I subscribed. There I can see
if it is really specific architecture issue or the failure shows up on many
others. And I am always interested in other uClibc-ng toolchain
related issues on other exotic architectures. (microblaze, nios2, ..)

best regards
 Waldemar