From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] core/sdk: generate the SDK tarball ourselves
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:47:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180610074727.GA2471@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180610080315.11cf122b@windsurf>
Thomas, All,
On 2018-06-10 08:03 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:06:07 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> > So, we fix that mess by creating the archive ourselves, giving it and
> remove the final "and"
Here, 'it' refers to 'the archive' listed just before. We want to give
'the archive' and 'the top-most directory'. So, this is really valid
english grammar. ;-)
I'll rephrase to avoid confusion:
So, we fix that mess by giving the top-most directory a
recogniseable name, based on the target tuple and the Buildroot
version, which we also use as the name of the archive (suffixed
with the usual +.tar.gz+.)
> > the top-most directory a recogniseable name, based on the target tuple
> > and the Buildroot version.
> >
> > Since this is an output file, we located it in the images/ directory.
> located -> locate
> or maybe "place", "store" ?
OK.
> > .PHONY: sdk
> > -sdk: world
> > +sdk: world $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY)
> > @$(call MESSAGE,"Rendering the SDK relocatable")
> > $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host
> > $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath staging
> > $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(TOPDIR)/support/misc/relocate-sdk.sh $(HOST_DIR)/relocate-sdk.sh
> > mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot
> > echo $(HOST_DIR) > $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot/sdk-location
> > + $(Q)mkdir -p $(BINARIES_DIR)
> > + $(TAR) czf $(BINARIES_DIR)/buildroot-sdk.$(GNU_TARGET_NAME)-$(BR2_VERSION_FULL).tar.gz \
> > + -C $(HOST_DIR) \
> > + --transform='s#^\.#buildroot-sdk.$(GNU_TARGET_NAME)-$(BR2_VERSION_FULL)#' \
> > + .
>
> Generally, I am fine with the principle, I believe it indeed makes
> sense to provide a tarball that is ready to use.
>
> I was a bit concerned about backward compatibility behavior for people
> already using "make sdk". But in fact your change is fine from this
> point of view: if people have scripts today that run "make sdk" and
> create a tarball from output/host, they will still work fine.
>
> > -It is possible to relocate the toolchain, this allows to distribute
> > -the toolchain to other developers to build applications for your
> > -target. To achieve this:
> > +Alternatively, Buildroot can also export the toolchain and all the
> > +development files of all selected packages,
>
> "all the development files" -> "the development files", otherwise the
> repetition of "all" is a bit annoying.
ACK.
> Looks good otherwise. Thanks!
OK, thanks for the review! :-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-10 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-09 21:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH] core/sdk: generate the SDK tarball ourselves Yann E. MORIN
2018-06-09 21:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-06-10 6:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-10 7:47 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2018-06-10 21:21 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-06-11 17:20 ` Trent Piepho
2018-06-11 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-11 22:10 ` Trent Piepho
2018-06-12 9:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-12 17:11 ` Trent Piepho
2018-06-12 13:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-06-12 17:47 ` Trent Piepho
2018-06-12 18:07 ` Stefan Becker
2018-06-12 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-12 19:25 ` Stefan Becker
2018-06-13 8:32 ` Andreas Naumann
2018-06-13 10:12 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-06-13 15:46 ` Andreas Naumann
2018-06-13 9:47 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-06-13 9:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-13 10:03 ` Stefan Becker
2018-06-13 11:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-15 18:27 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-06-13 7:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-06-13 7:59 ` Stefan Becker
2018-06-15 18:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180610074727.GA2471@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox