From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:34:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: Fix glibc building for ARC with stock binutils 2.30 In-Reply-To: References: <20180613163956.28894-1-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <20180613222953.23ac58db@windsurf> Message-ID: <20180613233410.23a34cd9@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:16:57 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > I've applied to master after: > > > > - Removing the number from the patch titles (use 'git format-patch -N' > > please!) > > Was it something we used to do before? Yes, that's not new. I believe it's even written in the Buildroot manual. > > - Adjusting the numbering of patch file names. Recently, Romain Naour > > renumbered all patches and made them Git formatted, so it would be > > nice to keep that consistency. > > I intentionally started from 10 so that a couple of more generic patches might be > squeezed before ARC-specific ones. But will keep in mind your preference for next > submissions. Yeah, we used to do that for gcc/binutils indeed, but it was a bit messy. Romain switched to a regular numbering as generated by git format-patch, which I believe makes sense. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com