Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCHv3] core/sdk: generate the SDK tarball ourselves
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 15:07:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180805130715.GD12445@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ2eMf7jyr=aw8T49+hPxxPw0Lk__vwdfvVr7Kg_Wb+rqNQng@mail.gmail.com>

Stefan, All,

On 2018-08-05 16:04 +0300, Stefan Becker spake thusly:
> Hi Yann, All,
> looks OK to me.

Thanks! :-)

Is that an equivalent to a formal 'Reviewed-by' tag? ;-)
https://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#_reviewing_and_testing_patches

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

> On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 11:27 AM Yann E. MORIN < [1]yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>   Currently, the wording in the manual instructs the user to generate a
>   tarball from "the contents of the +output/host+ directory".
> 
>   This is pretty confusing, because taken literally, this would amount to
>   running a command like:
> 
>   ? ? tar cf my-sdk.tar -C output/host/ .
> 
>   This creates a tarbomb [0], which is very bad practice, because when
>   extracted, it creates multiple files in the current directory.
> 
>   What one really wants to do, is create a tarball of the host/ directory,
>   with something like:
> 
>   ? ? tar cf my-sdk.tar -C output host/
> 
>   However, this is not much better, because the top-most directory would
>   have a very common name, host/, which is pretty easy to get conflict
>   with when it gets extracted.
> 
>   So, we fix that mess by giving the top-most directory a recognisable
>   name, based on the target tuple, which we also use as the name of the
>   archive (suffixed with the usual +.tar.gz+.) We offer the user the
>   possibility to override that default by specifying the +BR2_SDK_PREFIX+
>   variable on the command line.
> 
>   Since this is an output file, we place it in the images/ directory.
> 
>   As some users expressed a very strong feeling that they do not want to
>   generate a tarball at all, and that doing so would badly hurt their
>   workflows [1], we actually prepare the SDK as was previously done, but
>   under the new, intermediate rule 'prepare-sdk'. The existing 'sdk' rule
>   obviously depend on that before generating the tarball.
> 
>   We choose to make the existing rule to generate the tarball, and
>   introduce a new rule to just prepare the SDK, rather than keep the
>   existing rule as-is and introduce a new one to generate the tarball,
>   because it makes sense to have the simplest rule do the correct thing,
>   leaving advanced, power users use the longest command. If someone
>   already had a wrapper that called 'sdk' and expected just the host
>   directory to be prepared, then this is not broken; it just takes a bit
>   longer (gzip is pretty fast).
> 
>   Update the manual accordingly.
> 
>   [0] [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_(computing)#Tarbomb
>   [1] [3]http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2018-June/thread.html#223377
>   ? ? and some messages in the ensuing thread...
> 
>   Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" < [4]yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
>   Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger < [5]wg@grandegger.com>
>   Cc: Thomas Petazzoni < [6]thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
>   Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle < [7]arnout@mind.be>
>   Cc: Stefan Becker < [8]chemobejk@gmail.com>
>   Cc: Trent Piepho < [9]tpiepho@impinj.com>
> 
>   ---
>   Changes v2 -> v3:
>   ? - drop the version from the prefix? (Stefan, Thomas)
>   ? - actually have 'sdk' depend on 'prepare-sdk'
>   ? - anonymise the generated tarball
> 
>   Changes v1 -> v2:
>   ? - drop the part of the manual stating this can't be re-used as a
>   ? ? pre-built toolchain? (Arnout)
>   ? - make the top-level directory and tarball name configurable
>   ? ? (Trent, Thomas)
>   ? - change the default name? (Arnout)
>   ? - allow just preparing the SDK (Stefan, Trent)
>   ? - typoes? (Thomas)
>   ---
>   ?Makefile? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
>   ? | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   ?docs/manual/using-buildroot-toolchain.txt | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>   ?2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
>   diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>   index 37c7072c7c..e13e5eaefa 100644
>   --- a/Makefile
>   +++ b/Makefile
>   @@ -573,8 +573,8 @@ prepare: $(BUILD_DIR)/buildroot-config/auto.conf
>   ?.PHONY: world
>   ?world: target-post-image
> 
>   -.PHONY: sdk
>   -sdk: world
>   +.PHONY: prepare-sdk
>   +prepare-sdk: world
>   ? ? ? ? @$(call MESSAGE,"Rendering the SDK relocatable")
>   ? ? ? ? $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host
>   ? ? ? ? $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath staging
>   @@ -582,6 +582,17 @@ sdk: world
>   ? ? ? ? mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot
>   ? ? ? ? echo $(HOST_DIR) > $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot/sdk-location
> 
>   +BR2_SDK_PREFIX ?= $(GNU_TARGET_NAME)_sdk-buildroot
>   +.PHONY: sdk
>   +sdk: prepare-sdk $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY)
>   +? ? ? ?@$(call MESSAGE,"Generating SDK tarball")
>   +? ? ? ?$(if $(BR2_SDK_PREFIX),,$(error BR2_SDK_PREFIX can not be empty))
>   +? ? ? ?$(Q)mkdir -p $(BINARIES_DIR)
>   +? ? ? ?$(TAR) czf "$(BINARIES_DIR)/$(BR2_SDK_PREFIX).tar.gz" \
>   +? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--owner=0 --group=0 --numeric-owner \
>   +? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--transform='s#^\.#$(BR2_SDK_PREFIX)#' \
>   +? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-C $(HOST_DIR) "."
>   +
>   ?# Populating the staging with the base directories is handled by the skeleton package
>   ?$(STAGING_DIR):
>   ? ? ? ? @mkdir -p $(STAGING_DIR)
>   diff --git a/docs/manual/using-buildroot-toolchain.txt b/docs/manual/using-buildroot-toolchain.txt
>   index 3246dc2411..0c0c35fced 100644
>   --- a/docs/manual/using-buildroot-toolchain.txt
>   +++ b/docs/manual/using-buildroot-toolchain.txt
>   @@ -12,15 +12,23 @@ The toolchain generated by Buildroot is located by default in
>   ?+output/host/bin/+ to your PATH environment variable and then to
>   ?use +ARCH-linux-gcc+, +ARCH-linux-objdump+, +ARCH-linux-ld+, etc.
> 
>   -It is possible to relocate the toolchain, this allows to distribute
>   -the toolchain to other developers to build applications for your
>   -target. To achieve this:
>   +Alternatively, Buildroot can also export the toolchain and the development
>   +files of all selected packages, as an SDK, by running the command
>   ++make sdk+. This generates a tarball of the content of the host directory
>   ++output/host/+, named +<TARGET-TUPLE>_sdk-buildroot.tar.gz+ (which can be
>   +overriden by setting the environment variable +BR2_SDK_PREFIX+) and
>   +located in the output directory +output/images/+.
> 
>   -* run +make sdk+, which prepares the toolchain to be relocatable;
>   -* tarball the contents of the +output/host+ directory;
>   -* distribute the resulting tarball.
>   +This tarball can then be distributed to application developers, when
>   +they want to develop their applications that are not (yet) packaged as
>   +a Buildroot package.
> 
>   -Once the toolchain is installed to the new location, the user must run
>   -the +relocate-sdk.sh+ script to make sure all paths are updated with
>   -the new location.
>   +Upon extracting the SDK tarball, the user must run the script
>   ++relocate-sdk.sh+ (located at the top directory of the SDK), to make
>   +sure all paths are updated with the new location.
> 
>   +Alternatively, if you just want to prepare the SDK without generating
>   +the tarball (e.g. because you will just be moving the +host+ directory,
>   +or will be generating the tarball on your own), Buildroot also allows
>   +you to just prepare the SDK with +make prepare-sdk+ without actually
>   +generating a tarball.
>   --
>   2.14.1
> 
> Links:
> 1. mailto:yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
> 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_(computing)#Tarbomb
> 3. http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2018-June/thread.html#223377
> 4. mailto:yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
> 5. mailto:wg at grandegger.com
> 6. mailto:thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
> 7. mailto:arnout at mind.be
> 8. mailto:chemobejk at gmail.com
> 9. mailto:tpiepho at impinj.com

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-05 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-04  8:27 [Buildroot] [PATCHv3] core/sdk: generate the SDK tarball ourselves Yann E. MORIN
2018-08-05 13:04 ` Stefan Becker
2018-08-05 13:07   ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2018-08-05 13:20 ` Stefan Becker
2018-08-05 13:29   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-08-14 14:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180805130715.GD12445@scaer \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox