Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of defconfig build failures
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:06:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816220655.37fbff34@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVNs8470+VwKJCM68cHdp+ZgD-JxEpCbUpMXte4JYm68Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:52:25 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:

> > I don't think it's related to building with new compilers. It's just
> > some U-Boot versions that are broken if libfdt headers are already
> > available in the include path.
> 
> I can try to have a look somewhere next week.

OK, thanks.

> From the previous solution, I have a feeling that we can only go so
> far in trying to solve the issue from Buildroot. We did already one
> thing, and it seems insufficient for some u-boot versions.
> There is a risk that what we do to fix these new failures, may break
> some of those that work today.
> We could implement some kind of detection to see how we need to solve
> the issue depending on the u-boot at hand, but it could be cumbersome.

Indeed.

> An alternative solution is to document the known solution to this
> problem (the patches). We can apply these patches to the defconfigs
> inside buildroot, and let users with custom u-boots apply the patches
> themselves (i.e. make them aware from release notes or documentation
> but don't solve it automatically).

That would be an option yes, but not the nicest one. But still better
than having all the defconfigs failing like they are today :/

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-16 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-12 15:01 [Buildroot] Analysis of defconfig build failures Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-15 19:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-15 19:34   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-15 21:27     ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-15 22:18       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-16 19:52         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-16 20:06           ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-23 19:49             ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-25 20:21               ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-25 20:54                 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-27  8:12                   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-27  8:28                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-27  8:45                       ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-27 21:01                         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-27 21:19                           ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-28  8:07                             ` Luca Ceresoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180816220655.37fbff34@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox