From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of defconfig build failures
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:06:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816220655.37fbff34@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVNs8470+VwKJCM68cHdp+ZgD-JxEpCbUpMXte4JYm68Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:52:25 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> > I don't think it's related to building with new compilers. It's just
> > some U-Boot versions that are broken if libfdt headers are already
> > available in the include path.
>
> I can try to have a look somewhere next week.
OK, thanks.
> From the previous solution, I have a feeling that we can only go so
> far in trying to solve the issue from Buildroot. We did already one
> thing, and it seems insufficient for some u-boot versions.
> There is a risk that what we do to fix these new failures, may break
> some of those that work today.
> We could implement some kind of detection to see how we need to solve
> the issue depending on the u-boot at hand, but it could be cumbersome.
Indeed.
> An alternative solution is to document the known solution to this
> problem (the patches). We can apply these patches to the defconfigs
> inside buildroot, and let users with custom u-boots apply the patches
> themselves (i.e. make them aware from release notes or documentation
> but don't solve it automatically).
That would be an option yes, but not the nicest one. But still better
than having all the defconfigs failing like they are today :/
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-16 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-12 15:01 [Buildroot] Analysis of defconfig build failures Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-15 19:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-15 19:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-15 21:27 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-15 22:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-16 19:52 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-16 20:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-23 19:49 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-25 20:21 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-25 20:54 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-27 8:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-27 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-27 8:45 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-27 21:01 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-08-27 21:19 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-08-28 8:07 ` Luca Ceresoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180816220655.37fbff34@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox