Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next/RFC v2 1/2] package/mariadb: handle missing ucontext_t
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:56:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831225635.5dd4d83d@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180826170326.18743-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>

Hello Bernd,

+Waldemar in Cc, since there is (in my opinion) something not really
good going on in uClibc-ng, see below.

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 19:03:25 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> On some archs uclibc does not provide ucontext_t, for details see
> https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=f1cbfeea95e6287c7a666aafc182ffa318eff262
> 
> Mariadb uses ucontext_t optionally, its use can be disabled by the
> corresponding cmake option. Instead of copying the Config.in code from
> libsigsegv we shamelessly use its ARCH_SUPPORTS option while thinking
> that a more general approach might be needed for ucontext_t support so
> please consider this patch a RFC.

Indeed, hijacking the libsigsegv Config.in symbol is not really nice.
Having a global BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_UCONTEXT symbol would be OK, but I
believe in the case of mariadb, it shouldn't be needed.

Indeed, MariaDB configure.cmake contains this:

CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(ucontext.h HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
IF(NOT HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
  CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(sys/ucontext.h HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
ENDIF()
IF(HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
  CHECK_FUNCTION_EXISTS(makecontext HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
ENDIF()

Which should do the following:

 - Check if ucontext.h exists, and if so, define HAVE_UCONTEXT_H

 - If HAVE_UCONTEXT_H is still not defined, check if sys/ucontext.h
   exists, and if it's the case, define HAVE_UCONTEXT_H

 - If HAVE_UCONTEXT_H is defined, test if makecontext exists, and store
   the result in HAVE_UCONTEXT_H.

So in our case, because makecontext() is not implemented, mariadb
should not use ucontext support.

But this doesn't work, because that's not how CHECK_FUNCTION_EXISTS()
work. If the variable passed is already defined to one, then it does
nothing.

So, can you change to something like this:

CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(ucontext.h HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
IF(NOT HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
  CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(sys/ucontext.h HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
ENDIF()
CHECK_FUNCTION_EXISTS(makecontext HAVE_MAKECONTEXT)
IF(NOT HAVE_MAKECONTEXT)
  UNSET(HAVE_UCONTEXT_H)
ENDIF()

it should work a bit better. Beware that there are two locations where
ucontext.h is tested:

 - in configure.cmake
 - in libmariadb/cmake/CheckIncludeFiles.cmake

Side note for Waldemar: uClibc-ng approach here is a bit unclean: it
installs <ucontext.h> even if the architecture doesn't support the
context functions. And this <ucontext.h> does basically nothing,
because its entire contents are enclosed in an
__UCLIBC_HAS_CONTEXT_FUNCS__ condition. Waldemar: perhaps this should
be fixed in uClibc-ng ?

> Musl also does not provide ucontext functions:
> https://wiki.musl-libc.org/open-issues.html

This is interesting, because it shows that the comment in
libsigsegv/Config.in is not correct:

        # with glibc/musl, ucontext is available for all supported
        # architectures
        default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
        default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL

What is available for all architectures is ucontext.h, but the context
functions are not available for any architecture. So, libsigsegv needs
ucontext.h, not the context functions.

Could you have a look at fixing the CMake logic in MariaDB to rely on
the presence of makecontext() to decide automatically if ucontext
should be used or not ?

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-26 17:03 [Buildroot] [PATCH/next/RFC v2 1/2] package/mariadb: handle missing ucontext_t Bernd Kuhls
2018-08-26 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] package/mariadb: bump version to 10.3.9 Bernd Kuhls
2018-08-27 13:33   ` Ryan Coe
2018-08-31 20:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180831225635.5dd4d83d@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox