From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:01:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/3] Makefile: add tainting support In-Reply-To: References: <1536163596-5310-1-git-send-email-angelo@amarulasolutions.com> <1536163596-5310-2-git-send-email-angelo@amarulasolutions.com> <20180905213727.56f5fecc@windsurf> Message-ID: <20180906000105.021f9ccc@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 23:45:47 +0200, Angelo Compagnucci wrote: > > So: do we care about host packages for "tainting" ? If we do care, how > > do we handle this ? > > I think we can demand the decision to when we will have a host package > that needs tainting support. > > Moreover, I don't think the demand for host packages that needs > tainting support will be high in the future. Then we need to make that explicit: ifeq ($$($(2)_TYPE),host) ifneq ($$($(2)_TAINTS),) $$(error "Host package $(1) has $(2)_TAINTS set: not supported) endif endif of course, please check that this really works as expected. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com