From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:10:58 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 02/14] boot/at91bootstrap: URL update In-Reply-To: References: <1537449899-9576-1-git-send-email-matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com> <1537449899-9576-2-git-send-email-matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com> <20180920221259.72b5b016@windsurf> Message-ID: <20180920231058.58662563@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:35:14 -0500, Matthew Weber wrote: > > > diff --git a/boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in b/boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in > > > index 0f6430f..3d649b1 100644 > > > --- a/boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in > > > +++ b/boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in > > > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ config BR2_TARGET_AT91BOOTSTRAP > > > - Physical media algorithm such as DataFlash, NandFlash, NOR > > > Flash... > > > > > > + https://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/LegacyAT91Bootstrap > > > > Actually, this one should use: > > > > https://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/LegacyAT91Bootstrap > > > > Ok so this patch is ok then Ah, yes, my bad, sorry :-/ > and for the at91dataflashboot I found it mentioned on the same legacy > page but it definitely is a weak reference. I sent an e-mail to Atmel^WMicrochip people about at91dataflashboot, we'll see what they have to say. > > Perhaps your script should support a way of specifying "yeah, there > > is no upstream location" in an explicit way. > > Is that maybe a string we put in the end of the help section? "No > Upstream URL" Yes, I was thinking about something like that. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com