From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:39:18 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 In-Reply-To: References: <20180915060039.533E3207D4@mail.bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20181006093918.750d4197@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:59:36 -0600, Peter Thompson wrote: > Sorry I am so slow getting back. I was on holidays most of Sept. No problem. > This problem (AFAIK) is the Buildroot configure which is failing is trying > to build both SDL and SDL2 which are two incompatible versions of the same > thing. > 881 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL=y > 904 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2=y > > What is being attempted to be configured and built here would never work > (in my opinion). > > We could try to automate buildroot so only one or the other is selectable. > It would mean adding "depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2" and "depends on > !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL" to each of the packages Config.in. I don't see any actual error in the autobuild report at http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/552817141d7eb0c5037114a4bc7d2d76de871285 that you're replying to. Also, I believe SDL and SDL2 libraries have different names, so they can co-exist in the same system. Hence, it doesn't seem like there is a good reason to make them mutually exclusive. Could you explain what in the autobuild report above makes you think it is a SDL/SDL2 conflict ? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com