From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:56:33 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package In-Reply-To: <20180922193631.14369-1-asafka7@gmail.com> References: <20180922193631.14369-1-asafka7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20181009155633.2ad54938@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:28 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > Cryptographic library for Python > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon Let's add some license experts in the loop. > +PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 I am not sure this is an accurate description of the license terms. Reading https://pycryptodome.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/license.html (which is the same as the LICENSE.rst you use as a license file), it says: """ The source code in PyCryptodome is partially in the public domain and partially released under the BSD 2-Clause license. """ There is also the text of the Apache 2.0 license, but it doesn't say to which part of the code it applies. And there is a special constraint for the OCB cipher, that it cannot be used for military purposes. I am not sure how Debian accepts that, but they do accept it: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/pycryptodome/pycryptodome_3.6.1-2_copyright. Yann, Arnout, I'm interested by your opinion on this package. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com