From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:20:18 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] configs/{at91sam9*, atmel*}: drop OpenSSH as it duplicates Dropbear In-Reply-To: <9b5b2780-92cf-682a-7ada-f6af691652ad@microchip.com> References: <20181026094024.31108-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <9b5b2780-92cf-682a-7ada-f6af691652ad@microchip.com> Message-ID: <20181026142018.62c47e7b@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:48:44 +0000, Nicolas.Ferre at microchip.com wrote: > On 26/10/2018 at 11:40, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > The "development" defconfigs for Atmel platforms enable both OpenSSH > > and Dropbear, which doesn't make a lot of sense, as only one SSH > > server can start on port 22. > > > > This commit therefore drops BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSH=y from those > > defconfigs, keeping Dropbear as an SSH server/client. > > A gut feeling is telling me that I would have preferred the other way > around: Keeping OpenSSH. I don't really care either way. Those defconfigs already have plenty of packages enabled anyway (which is the whole point of those defconfigs). Should I resend a v2 that keeps BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSH=y and drops BR2_PACKAGE_DROPBEAR=y ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com