From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:14:43 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] llvm: enable bpf In-Reply-To: <20181103122758.10578-2-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> References: <20181103122758.10578-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> <20181103122758.10578-2-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20181103141443.3c86e3f9@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:27:56 +0100, Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > BPF (in-kernel bytecode machine) is needed by libv4l > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine > --- > package/llvm/llvm.mk | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/llvm/llvm.mk b/package/llvm/llvm.mk > index 1f9bd447f5..dae5d3f16d 100644 > --- a/package/llvm/llvm.mk > +++ b/package/llvm/llvm.mk > @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_AMDGPU),y) > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += AMDGPU > endif > > +# Build BPF (in-kernel bytecode machine) > +LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += BPF Perhaps we should make this optional ? Or maybe the build time difference is not that significant ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com