From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:00:26 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] shadowsocks-libev: add connmarktos build option In-Reply-To: <871s7jh1jd.fsf@tkos.co.il> References: <1542300189-12939-1-git-send-email-sebastien.duponcheel@corp.ovh.com> <87o9aq5hcb.fsf@tkos.co.il> <25f6955b-c3f1-28a1-2a51-6ad90f391c9c@corp.ovh.com> <871s7jh1jd.fsf@tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <20181120090026.0091891c@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:49:58 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > > config BR2_PACKAGE_SHADOWSOCKS_LIBEV_CONNMARKTOS > > - bool "enable connmarktos feature" > > + bool "ss-server: enable connmarktos feature" > > depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SHADOWSOCKS_LIBEV > > select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNETFILTER_CONNTRACK > > help > > - Build with the connmark to TOS feature > > + Build ss-server with the connmark to TOS feature. > > + This feature require advanced tc, iptables and conntrac > > + rules to perform QoS on the server side. > > + if unsure say N. > > Sounds reasonable to me. Let's see what others think. Yes, soon reasonable to me as well. Perhaps the option title should be: bool "conmarktos support in ss-server" or bool "ss-server conmarktos support" S?bastien, could you take into account the various comments received from Baruch, and send an updated version ? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com