From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:35:09 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/postgresql: needs wchar In-Reply-To: <20181116092424.79d94e4b@windsurf> References: <20181023160931.16417-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <643ca3d2-1825-4707-5fbb-0817229188f9@mind.be> <20181101223046.72222a3c@windsurf> <20181115165903.GL10271@scaer> <20181116092424.79d94e4b@windsurf> Message-ID: <20181120183509.GD2601@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2018-11-16 09:24 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:59:03 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > And in retrospect, I think it *is* better that we do drop them. If the > > top-level option loses that dependency, then it is 'easy' to detect it > > has become mandatory for a sub-option, because the autobuilders will > > fail. > > > > However, if we repeat the dependency and the top-level option lses it > > and we forget to remove it, we will never realise that the sub-option > > shouldalso lose it. > > That is indeed a good argument. Should we settle on the idea that we > should not uselessly replicate such dependencies ? Yes, let's not replicate them. And accept patches that removes them. And accept a patch that updates the manual accordnigly, of course! ;-) (I'll see what I can do...) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'