From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH next] tpm2-abrmd: fix build without stack smashing protection (SSP)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:06:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181121210652.5c083b7b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181121174337.341-1-casantos@datacom.com.br>
Hello,
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:43:37 -0200, Carlos Santos wrote:
> The configuration environment setup that disables SSP if the toolchain
> does not support it must be updated after the bump to version 2.0.3.
>
> Fixes:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/bd9005eeb24678aa530179a80bbc99b2176f8559
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/feff61dcb481a94f5f030117830984c5e09727ea
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.com.br>
> ---
> package/tpm2-abrmd/tpm2-abrmd.mk | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/tpm2-abrmd/tpm2-abrmd.mk b/package/tpm2-abrmd/tpm2-abrmd.mk
> index a4d9cfb384..74cc66ba20 100644
> --- a/package/tpm2-abrmd/tpm2-abrmd.mk
> +++ b/package/tpm2-abrmd/tpm2-abrmd.mk
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ TPM2_ABRMD_DEPENDENCIES = dbus libglib2 tpm2-tss host-pkgconf
>
> # configure.ac doesn't contain a link test, so it doesn't detect when
> # libssp is missing.
> -TPM2_ABRMD_CONF_ENV = ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector_all=$(if $(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SSP),yes,no)
> +TPM2_ABRMD_CONF_ENV = ax_cv_check_cflags___________Werror_______fstack_protector_all=$(if $(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SSP),yes,no)
It's a bit annoying to fix this once in a while, what about the
following change instead:
diff --git a/m4/flags.m4 b/m4/flags.m4
index 1b01198..59b6d5b 100644
--- a/m4/flags.m4
+++ b/m4/flags.m4
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ dnl mandatory (configure will fail).
dnl $1: C compiler flag to add to EXTRA_CFLAGS.
dnl $2: Set to "required" to cause configure failure if flag not supported..
AC_DEFUN([AX_ADD_COMPILER_FLAG],[
- AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG([$1],[
+ AX_CHECK_LINK_FLAG([$1],[
EXTRA_CFLAGS="$EXTRA_CFLAGS $1"
AC_SUBST([EXTRA_CFLAGS])],[
AS_IF([test x$2 != xrequired],[
(entirely untested). It could be submitted upstream.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-21 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-21 17:43 [Buildroot] [PATCH next] tpm2-abrmd: fix build without stack smashing protection (SSP) Carlos Santos
2018-11-21 20:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-11-22 1:46 ` Carlos Santos
2018-11-23 14:01 ` Carlos Santos
2018-11-28 10:43 ` Carlos Santos
2018-12-03 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181121210652.5c083b7b@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox