From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:04:58 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libtool: Make libltdl a separate package In-Reply-To: References: <20181111150652.17459-1-alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> <20181111221717.0855ea32@windsurf.home> <56b213a9-830f-e08f-faba-401d7296e32c@mind.be> <20181112080642.GB10271@scaer> Message-ID: <20181123090458.198c6852@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Alexander, On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:02:33 +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > But it seems that HOST_LIBTOOL package is widely used and it would look awkward > for me if we would build completely different stuff for LIBTOOL and HOST_LIBTOOL > package variants. We already do that for a few packages, where the host and target variant don't install the same stuff. libglib2 is an example that comes to mind for example, but there are others. > I'd rather go with LIBTOOL_RUNTIME package (or indeed LIBLTDL?), I can merge it into > libtool.mk and make all 4 target packages depend on it instead of full libtool. > > What are your thoughts? I think we really want what we suggested initially, i.e the target libtool package only install libltdl. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com