From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 10:45:53 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] docs/manual: standardize a bit more the formatting of commit titles In-Reply-To: <1442786873.3545705.1543108593942.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.com.br> References: <20181124101903.18138-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <1442786873.3545705.1543108593942.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.com.br> Message-ID: <20181125104553.3f24be17@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 23:16:33 -0200 (BRST), Carlos Santos wrote: > Looks good, but isn't "package/" a bit superfluous, since Most of the > commits are for packages? It also goes against the tradition: > > $ git log --oneline origin/master | grep -i '^.......... [^ /]*: bump' |wc -l > 7644 > $ git log --oneline origin/master | grep -i '^.......... [^ ]*/[^ ]*: bump' |wc -l > 2296 Yes, I agree the tradition has been without package/. I myself used to prefer without package/. However, it is not very consistent, as then when we have boot/uboot, is it about package/boot/uboot ? Or when we have core: , is it about the package "core" ? While I was personally not adding package/, I saw others doing it, and ultimately found it more consistent. > BTW, I want the bike shed red. Red is not too bad :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com