Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 07/10] core: implement per-package SDK and target
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:58:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206115822.4df83e17@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9730d54-6360-6144-8461-afa25bf32727@andin.de>

Hello Andreas,

On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:42:37 +0100, Andreas Naumann wrote:

> > Nope, this is expected. During the build output/host/lib doesn't exist,  
> 
> of course
> 
> > it's only populated at the very end of the build in host-finalize. So
> > indeed the RPATH of binaries point to various per-package host/lib
> > folders. This is totally expected.  
> 
> Hmm, at this stage the host-finalize step was already run, so now 
> output/host does exist.

Yes, but the RPATH of host binaries are not fixed up in host-finalize.
They are fixed up as part of prepare-sdk:

prepare-sdk: world
        @$(call MESSAGE,"Rendering the SDK relocatable")
        $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host
        $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath staging

so it is totally expected that at the end of the build the host
binaries carry those RPATH pointing to per-package host/lib folders.
And it is not a problem: those folders exist, they contain the right
libraries, so it's perfectly fine.

> >> After 'make prepare-sdk'
> >>     $ readelf -d output/host/sbin/mkfs.ext3
> >> shows
> >>     0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Bibliothek runpath: []  
> > 
> > This is obviously not good :-)
> > 
> > Thanks for reporting that, I'll have a look. I guess it's simply the
> > fixup of RPATH from absolute to relative that goes wrong.  
> 
> Would moving the fix-rpath step from prepare-sdk to host-finalize hurt?

It would not fix your problem: this fix-rpath step is currently broken
as it doesn't understand how to rewrite those RPATHs that point to
per-package host/lib.

So there are really two separate things:

 - Fixing the fix-rpath logic so that it works with per-package
   host/lib RPATHs. This is mandatory. After doing that, at the end of
   the build, the RPATH would still point to per-package host/lib, but
   after prepare-sdk you will have again the correct relative RPATH you
   used to have before the per-package stuff.

 - Moving fix-rpath at the end of the build so that instead of those
   weird per-package host/lib RPATH, you have nice relative RPATHs,
   without the need to run prepare-sdk. This is not mandatory at all,
   and would be just for convenience/beauty.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-23 14:58 [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 00/10] Per-package host/target directory support Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 01/10] Makefile: evaluate CCACHE and HOST{CC, CXX} at time of use Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-26 18:14   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 02/10] support/scripts/check-host-rpath: split condition on two statements Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-26 18:14   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 03/10] Makefile: rework main directory creation logic Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-23 18:07   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-11-26 18:14   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 04/10] Makefile: move .NOTPARALLEL statement after including .config file Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-26 18:15   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 05/10] Makefile: define TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE relative to TARGET_DIR Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-26 18:15   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 06/10] package/pkg-generic: adjust config scripts tweaks for per-package directories Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-23 18:09   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-11-26 18:15   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 07/10] core: implement per-package SDK and target Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-23 21:50   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-12-04 22:24   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-12-05  8:04     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-05  9:18       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-12-05  9:44         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-05 10:41           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-12-05 16:08   ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-05 16:31     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-05 16:52       ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-06 10:21         ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-06 10:28           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-06 10:42             ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-06 10:58               ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-12-06 13:31                 ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-26 17:34           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-26 18:33             ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2019-01-10 21:25               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-01-11 20:09                 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2019-01-13 22:10                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-01-14 16:01                     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2019-01-14 16:33                       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-14 20:19                       ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2019-01-14 20:43                         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-12-26 18:58             ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-12-27 16:17             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-10 21:14               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 08/10] Makefile: allow top-level parallel build with BR2_PER_PACKAGE_DIRECTORIES=y Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-23 18:11   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 09/10] package/pkg-generic: make libtool .la files compatible with per-package directories Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-25 17:57   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-11-30 10:20     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-01 10:59       ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-11-23 14:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next v6 10/10] package/pkg-kconfig: handle KCONFIG_DEPENDENCIES " Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-25 17:57   ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-12-05 15:23   ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-06 14:07     ` Andreas Naumann
2018-12-06 14:25       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-26 16:40       ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181206115822.4df83e17@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox