From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] strace on xtensa/uclibc
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:13:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207091356.605a9c69@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181207070029.CF0512073D@mail.bootlin.com>
Hello,
+Baruch, Max Filipov for Xtensa and Waldemar for uClibc-ng.
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:00:29 +0100 (CET), Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> xtensa | strace-4.25 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/5a0112b7a2c81fa5253c9adc93efe415256cd811 |
I had a look at those failures of strace on xtensa:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=strace-4.25
I.e, strace 4.25 only fails to build on Xtensa. The reason is that
uClibc-ng doesn't have the correct values for some POLL* macros: they
don't match the kernel values.
Let's take POLLWRBAND as an example. The kernel defines it like this:
arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/poll.h:#define POLLWRBAND 0x0100
So strace 4.25 checks that it has the correct value:
#if defined(__m68k__) || defined(__mips__) || defined(__sparc__) || defined(__xtensa__)
#if defined(POLLWRBAND) || (defined(HAVE_DECL_POLLWRBAND) && HAVE_DECL_POLLWRBAND)
DIAG_PUSH_IGNORE_TAUTOLOGICAL_COMPARE
static_assert((POLLWRBAND) == (0x0100), "POLLWRBAND != 0x0100");
But uClibc-ng doesn't have an arch-specific header to define POLLWRBAND
on xtensa, so it falls back to the generic definition, which isn't
correct for xtensa:
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/poll.h:# define POLLWRBAND 0x200 /* Priority data may be written. */
The same issue happens with POLLREMOVE.
I think xtensa needs to have its own
libc/sysdeps/linux/xtensa/bits/poll.h in uClibc-ng.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-07 7:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2018-12-06 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-07 8:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-12-11 12:50 ` [Buildroot] strace on xtensa/uclibc Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-12 15:27 ` Max Filippov
2018-12-12 15:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181207091356.605a9c69@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox